Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The principle that, for optimal retrieval, documents should be ranked in order of the probability of relevance or usefulness has been brought into question by Cooper. It is shown that the principle can be justified under certain assumptions, but that in cases where these assumptions do not hold, the principle is not valid. The major problem appears to lie in the way the principle considers each document independently of the rest. The nature of the information on the basis of which the system decides whether or not to retrieve the documents determines whether the document‐by‐document approach is valid.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stephen Robertson
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Journal of Documentation
University College London
Library and Archives Canada
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stephen Robertson (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a5be7df43cb70ca574a2e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026647
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: