Primary prevention ICDs significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared to medical therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.93; P=.008).
Meta-Analysis (n=1,874)
Do primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators reduce all-cause mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?
Primary prevention ICDs significantly reduce all-cause mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy compared to medical therapy.
Effect estimate: HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.93)
p-value: p=.008
Importance: Conflicting data have emerged on the efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (primary prevention ICDs) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Objective: To investigate the association of primary prevention ICDs with all-cause mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Data Sources: PubMed was searched from January 1, 2000, through October 31, 2016, for the terms implantable defibrillator OR implantable cardioverter defibrillator AND non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Additional references were identified from bibliographies of pertinent articles and queries to experts in this field. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria consisted of a randomized clinical trial design and comparison of the ICD with medical therapy (control) in at least 100 patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. In addition, studies had to report on all-cause mortality during a follow-up period of at least 12 months and be published in English. The search yielded 10 studies, of which only 1 met the inclusion criteria. A search of bibliographies of pertinent articles and queries of experts in this field led to 3 additional studies. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The PRISMA guidelines were used to abstract data and assess data quality and validity. Data were pooled using fixed- and random-effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Before data collection started, primary prevention ICDs were hypothesized to reduce all-cause mortality among patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Results: Four randomized clinical trials met the selection criteria and included 1874 unique patients; 937 were in the ICD group and 937 in the control group. Pooling data from these trials showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with an ICD (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.93; P = .008; P = .87 for heterogeneity). Conclusions and Relevance: Primary prevention ICDs are efficacious at reducing all-cause mortality among patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. These findings support professional guidelines that recommend the use of ICDs in such patients.
Al‐Khatib et al. (Wed,) conducted a meta-analysis in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n=1,874). implantable cardioverter defibrillators vs. medical therapy was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.93, p=.008). Primary prevention ICDs significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared to medical therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.93; P=.008).