A combination of lesion assessment techniques, including impedance, contact force, and ablation indices, is recommended to achieve durable lesions and improve long-term outcomes during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Comprehensive lesion assessment using a combination of biophysical parameters and imaging techniques is crucial for achieving durable pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent arrhythmia, while pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone in its treatment. The creation of durable lesions is crucial for successful and long-lasting PVI, as inconsistent lesions lead to reconnections and recurrence after ablation. Various approaches have been developed to assess lesion quality and transmurality in vivo, acting as surrogates for improved lesion creation and long-term outcomes utilizing radiofrequency (RF) energy. This review manuscript examines the biophysics of lesion creation and different lesion assessment techniques that can be used daily in the electrophysiology laboratory when utilizing RF energy. These methods provide valuable insights into lesion effectiveness, facilitating optimized ablation procedures and reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrences. However, each approach has its limitations, and a combination of techniques is recommended for comprehensive lesion assessment during AF catheter ablation. Future advancements in imaging techniques, such as magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), optical coherence tomography, and photoacoustic imaging, hold promise in further enhancing lesion evaluation and guiding treatment strategies.
Gracia et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Atrial Fibrillation. Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation was evaluated. A combination of lesion assessment techniques, including impedance, contact force, and ablation indices, is recommended to achieve durable lesions and improve long-term outcomes during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: