Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems face significant performance gaps when applied to technical domains requiring precise information extraction from complex documents. Current evaluation methodologies relying on document-level metrics inadequately capture token-resolution retrieval accuracy that is critical for domain-related documents. We propose a framework combining granular evaluation metrics with synthetic data generation to optimize domain-specific RAG performance.First, we introduce token-aware metrics PrecisionΩ and Intersection-over-Union (IoU) that quantify context preservation versus information density trade offs inherent in technical texts. Second, we develop a reasoning model driven pipeline using instruction-tuned LLMs (DeepSeek-R1, DeepSeek-R1 distilled variants and Phi-4) to generate context-anchored QA pairs with discontinuous reference spans across three specialized corpora: SEC 10-K filings (finance), biomedical abstracts (PubMed), and APT threat reports (cybersecurity).Our empirical analysis reveals critical insights: smaller chunks (less than 10 tokens) improve precision by 31–42% (IoU=0.071 vs. baseline 0.053) at recall costs (–18%), while domain-specific embedding strategies yield 22% variance in optimal chunk sizing (5–20 tokens). The DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B model demonstrates superior concept alignment (+14% mean IoU over alternatives), though no configuration universally dominates financial texts favor larger chunks for risk factor coverage (Recall=0.81@size=20), whereas cybersecurity content benefits from atomic segmentation (PrecisionΩ=0.28@size=5).We open-source this toolkit enabling reproducible optimization of chunking strategies through automated synthetic dataset generation and multi-metric analysis pipelines. This work bridges critical gaps between generic RAG architectures and enterprise requirements for precision-sensitive domains. Our code is available on https://github.com/aryan-jadon/Synthetic-Data-Generation-and-Evaluation-using-Reasoning-Models.
Jadon et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: