Time-series clustering is a core analytical technique for data exploration and as a subroutine in downstream tasks. Although deep learning methods have surged recently, studies show that traditional algorithms, such as k -Shape, still achieve state-of-the-art performance, revealing an illusion of progress. k -Shape alternates between (i) cluster assignment using the Shape-based distance (SBD) and (ii) centroid update while preserving scale and temporal alignment. However, its cubic-time centroid computation limits scalability to long sequences. Despite advances in univariate time-series (UTS) clustering, multivariate (MTS) clustering remains underexplored—multiple channels complicate inter-channel dependency modeling and amplify the accuracy–runtime trade-off. To overcome these challenges, we introduce FASA and its multivariate extension MUFASA: scalable, accurate, and parameter-light methods. FASA derives a closed-form solution that minimizes within-cluster SBD distance in linear time, while MUFASA (i) introduces SBD-D, a distance measure identifying a global temporal alignment across channels, and (ii) introduces a centroid update that jointly estimates all channels to capture temporal and inter-channel dependencies efficiently. To demonstrate the effectiveness, we conduct the most comprehensive evaluation to date in the MTS clustering area—covering seven MTS distances and 21 clustering algorithms on 30 UEA MTS datasets—and benchmark FASA on 128 UCR UTS datasets against eight baselines. Results show that (i) SBD-D matches the accuracy of elastic distances while being on average two to four orders of magnitude faster, and (ii) MUFASA outperforms all scalable traditional, deep learning, and foundation models in accuracy while matching non-scalable ones at much lower runtime. Notably, FASA matches k -Shape's accuracy while exhibiting better scalability, especially with increasing length. Overall, MUFASA and FASA deliver efficient and accurate solutions for MTS and UTS clustering, respectively, paving the way for future progress in time-series analytics.
Li et al. (Mon,) studied this question.