Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
As universities increasingly work towards the adoption of their third mission—fostering entrepreneurship and innovation—the concept of the Entrepreneurial University (EntUni) emphasizes the need to cultivate a defined set of entrepreneurial competencies in students, such as opportunity recognition, risk-taking, perseverance, self-efficacy, and adaptability. The purpose of this study is to identify which entrepreneurial competencies are most critical for student readiness within the context of an Entrepreneurial University. However, limited consensus remains on which competencies are most essential. This study identifies the entrepreneurial competencies most critical for students within an Entrepreneurial University context through a mixed-methods approach. A student survey assesses self-perceived competencies; a stakeholder survey captures the perspectives of faculty, industry experts, and entrepreneurs; and qualitative interviews with industry professionals explore best practices for competency development. Findings reveal six core competencies that EntUnis should help students cultivate: proactiveness, perseverance, grit, risk propensity, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention. Industry experts further highlight the importance of teamwork, ethical and sustainable thinking, and ambiguity tolerance—competencies often underdeveloped in academic environments. The study also identifies a disconnect between entrepreneurial education and practical application, with many students demonstrating high entrepreneurial intention but limited participation in start-up activities. These insights offer actionable implications for educators, policymakers, and university administrators. Overall, the study highlights the importance of experiential learning, academia-industry collaboration, and structured competency-building to enhance entrepreneurial readiness. By addressing these gaps, EntUnis can better equip students to drive innovation, economic growth, and societal impact.
CHRONAKI et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: