December 1, 1989

Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making.

DSDavid M. SchweigerSchweiger Dermatology Group (United States)WSWilliam SandbergUnited States Naval Research Laboratory PRPaula L. RechnerTexas State University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This longitudinal laboratory study of fast-advancing middle managers involved in strategic planning compared the effectiveness of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to ...

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schweiger et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e32cdf8c10024cd27abbe https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/256567

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1GROUP APPROACHES FOR IMPROVING STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIALECTICAL INQUIRY, DEVIL'S ADVOCACY, AND CONSENSUS.1986 · 672 citations
2The comparative effectiveness of dialectical inquiry and Devil's advocacy: The impact of task biases on previous research findings1984 · 42 citations
3Effects of Planning Aids and Presentation Media on Performance and Affective Responses in Strategic Decision-Making1984 · 46 citations
4Inquiry method effects on performance in a simulated business environment1985 · 28 citations
5Dialectical Inquiry in Strategic Planning: A Case of Premature Acceptance1981 · 72 citations

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper