Purpose The role of controlling shareholders in corporate governance has always been an important and classic topic in theoretical research, yet no consensus has been reached. Divergent findings on the governance role of controlling shareholders may largely stem from variations in research settings. Design/methodology/approach This study examines how controlling shareholders' involvement in fund management affects corporate stock price crash risk, using a unique setting of financial services agreements (FSAs) in China. Findings We find a robust U-shaped relationship between related deposits and stock price crash risk. When deposits remain below the contractual limit, controlling shareholder involvement significantly reduces crash risk, whereas exceeding the limit leads to a pronounced increase in crash risk. These effects are stronger in firms facing more severe classical agency problems and weaker external monitoring. Mechanism analyses show that below-limit deposits are associated with lower Type I and Type II agency costs, improved investment efficiency, and reduced bad-news hoarding, while above-limit deposits exacerbate Type II agency conflicts, reduce efficiency, and deteriorate the external information environment. Originality/value Overall, our findings highlight the conditional governance role of controlling shareholders and provide new evidence on how internal capital markets shape stock price crash risk in emerging markets.
Hu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: