Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In a probabilistic learning task with two complementary cues (C 1 and C 2 ) and two events (E 1 and E 2 ) the subject has a tendency to infer that E 2 will occur when C 2 occurs after he/she has observed that E 1 frequently goes with C 1 . This phenomenon was termed cue contrast because it reflects the belief that C 2 contrasts with C 1 and should indicate E 2 . Two kinds of predictions following from the notion of cue contrast were tested on response proportions from the first block of trials in four previously published experiments on cue probability learning. Of a total of 15 independent observations (eight within‐group comparisons; seven between‐group comparisons) 13 confirmed the predictions (sign test, p<0.005). It was concluded that cue utilization is both an inductive process based on association between cues and events and an inferential process based on contrast.
Mats P. Björkman (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: