The Heartwatch secondary prevention programme resulted in 44% of patients achieving a Continuing Care score >5 after 8 years, with male patients having a 0.432 point advantage.
Observational (n=5,700)
Yes
Does a structured secondary prevention programme in primary care improve cardiovascular risk factor control in patients with prior myocardial infarction or revascularization?
5,700 patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass graft, with at least 8 years in the Heartwatch programme in Ireland.
Heartwatch secondary prevention programme (standard protocol for continuing care based on WHO and ESC guidelines) administered by general practices.
Continuing Care (CCare) score out of eight, calculated based on programme targets for exercise, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, optimally controlled glucose, smoking status, and pharmacological treatment.composite
A structured secondary prevention program in primary care improves risk factor control over time, though many patients still fail to meet all guideline targets.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate patient follow-up data from Heartwatch: Ireland's secondary prevention programme for cardiovascular disease delivered in general practice. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study based on secondary analysis of routinely collected data from Heartwatch. SETTING: Heartwatch targeted 20% of general practices in Ireland and recruited 475 general practitioners across 325 practices. PARTICIPANTS: The patient population included people with a history of acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or a coronary artery bypass graft. Over 16 000 patients entered the programme however, to assess the long-term progress of patients, we identified a cohort of 5700 patients with at least 8 years in the programme. INTERVENTIONS: A standard protocol for continuing care of patients for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease was administered by general practices. The programme was designed using WHO and European Society of Cardiology guidelines on secondary prevention. OUTCOME MEASURES: A Continuing Care (CCare) score out of eight was the primary outcome measure used. It was calculated based on programme targets for well-known cardiovascular risk factors: exercise, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, optimally controlled glucose, smoking status, and pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: After 1 year, 37% of the 8-year cohort had achieved a CCare score >5 increasing to 44% after year 8. Patient sex was predictive of better scores; male patients had almost a half-point advantage (0.432, 99% CI: 0.335 to 0.509). Patients who enrolled earlier following their qualifying event and patients with more frequent visits were also more likely to achieve higher CCare scores. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients are not likely to meet all targets set by secondary prevention guidelines, however, supporting patient self-management may impact on this. Early enrolment after a cardiac event and frequent structured care visits should be priorities in the design and implementation of similar programmes. Ongoing evaluation of them is necessary to improve outcomes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robyn Homeniuk
Olympic Council of Ireland
Fintan Stanley
PublicPolicy.ie (Ireland)
J. Gallagher
University College Dublin
BMJ Open
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Homeniuk et al. (Sun,) conducted a observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=5,700). Heartwatch secondary prevention programme was evaluated on Continuing Care (CCare) score out of eight. The Heartwatch secondary prevention programme resulted in 44% of patients achieving a Continuing Care score >5 after 8 years, with male patients having a 0.432 point advantage.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f4fee5725bbd5cc5fa7b8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063811
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: