Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Gravitational lens modeling of spatially resolved sources is a challenging inverse prob-lem with many observational constraints and model parameters. We examine estab-lished pixel-based source reconstruction algorithms for de-lensing the source and con-straining lens model parameters. Using test data for four canonical lens configurations, we explore statistical and systematic uncertainties associated with gridding, source reg-ularisation, interpolation errors, noise, and telescope pointing. Specifically, we compare two gridding schemes in the source plane: a fully adaptive grid that follows the lens mapping but is irregular, and an adaptive Cartesian grid. We also consider regular-isation schemes that minimise derivatives of the source (using two finite difference methods) and introduce a scheme that minimises deviations from an analytic source profile. Careful choice of gridding and regularisation can reduce “discreteness noise ” in the χ2 surface that is inherent in the pixel-based methodology. With a gridded source, some degree of interpolation is unavoidable, and errors due to interpolation need to be taken into account (especially for high signal-to-noise data). Different realisations of the noise and telescope pointing lead to slightly different values for lens model pa-rameters, and the scatter between different “observations ” can be comparable to or larger than the model uncertainties themselves. The same effects create scatter in the lensing magnification at the level of a few percent for a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 10, which decreases as the data quality improves. Key words: gravitational lensing: strong – methods: numerical
Tagore et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: