Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this paper statistical test criteria are developed for testing equality of means, equality of variances and equality of covariances in a normal multivariate population of k variables on the basis of a sample. More specifically, three statistical hypotheses are considered: (i) H₌ₕ₂, the hypothesis that the means are equal, the variances are equal, and covariances are equal, (ii) Hₕ₂, the hypothesis that variances are equal and covariances are equal, irrespective of the values of the means, and (iii) Hₘ, the hypothesis of equal means, assuming variances are equal and covariances are equal. Test criteria L₌ₕ₂, Lₕ₂, and Lₘ are developed by the Neyman-Pearson method of likelihood ratios for testing H₌ₕ₂, Hₕ₂ and Hₘ respectively. The exact moments of each of the three test criteria when the three corresponding hypotheses are true are determined for any number k of variables and for any size, n, of the sample for which the distributions exist. The exact distributions of L₌ₕ₂ and Lₕ₂ are determined for k = 2 and k = 3, and the exact distribution of Lₘ is found for any k; these are all beta (Pearson Type I) distributions. Tables of 5% and 1% points of L₌ₕ₂, Lₕ₂ and Lₘ, based on Thompson's tables of percentage points of the Incomplete Beta Function, are given for certain values of k and n (Tables I and II). Also tables of values of approximate 5% and 1% points of -n L₌ₕ₂, -n Lₕ₂ and -n (k - 1) Lₘ for large values of n are given (Table III), based on the fact that these three quantities are approximately distributed according to chi-square laws for large values of n with 12k (k + 3) - 3, 12k (k + 1) - 2, and k - 1 degrees of freedom respectively. A table (Table IV) is given which shows how accurate the resulting approximate 5% and 1% points of L₌ₕ₂, Lc and Lₘ are. The paper is written in two parts. In Part I the problem of testing the three hypotheses is discussed and the mathematical results are presented together with an illustrative example. Part II is given for the reader who wishes to study the mathematical derivation of the results.
S. S. Wilks (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: