Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
SUMMARY It is suggested that the strength of a person’s beliefs may be tested by finding at what odds he is prepared to bet on them. This leads to a system of numerical “medial personal probabilities” obeying the classical laws of probability. However, these do not have precisely defined values, but are contained within specified intervals. The appropriate method of inference is Bayes’s Theorem. This leads to generally accepted statistical procedures in large samples, except that the “weight of evidence” and not significance level is the measure of conviction in a significance test. Under very general conditions decisions are made by maximizing expected utility.
Cedric A. B. Smith (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: