Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and complications of vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy performed with ultrasonographic (US) guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: US-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with an 11-gauge device was performed in 71 lesions in 67 consecutive women (age range, 23-82 years; mean age, 52.9 years). Vacuum-assisted core biopsy findings were compared with excisional biopsy, mammographic follow-up, and clinical follow-up findings (follow-up, 1-19 months; mean, 9.2 months). Procedural complications and treatment were noted. RESULTS: Of 71 lesions, 18 (25%) were diagnosed as malignant at core biopsy; one (1%), as premalignant; 30 (42%), as specific benign; and 22 (31%), as nonspecific benign. Of 18 malignant diagnoses, one (6%) was benign at excision. The premalignant specimen was benign at excision. Of 52 benign findings, 51 (98%) were proved benign at excision, mammographic follow-up, or clinical follow-up. One benign finding was carcinoma at excision. In this case, the specimen did not include the carcinoma because of a technical problem recognized at the time of the percutaneous procedure. Five (7%) of 71 biopsies resulted in bleeding beyond 10 minutes. One (1%) patient experienced a vasovagal response. CONCLUSION: According to these data, US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy is accurate. There may be a slightly higher risk of bleeding, which may be related to the lack of breast compression during the procedure, when compared with biopsy performed with stereotactic guidance.
Simon et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: