Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes This research is partly funded by a grant from the Minerals Management Service, US Department of the Interior, under Minerals Management Service Agreement No. 1435-01-00-CA-31063. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either express or implied, of the US government. The Field Institute is a non-partisan, not-for-profit public opinion research organisation. This survey was funded by the University of California Toxic Substances Research and Teaching Program. Neither the Field Institute nor the University of California Toxic Substances Research and Teaching Program is responsible for the analysis or interpretation of the data appearing here. We also estimated a set of equations with demographic variables (education, age, gender) in addition to the predispositions. The substantive results were identical.
Carlisle et al. (Mon,) studied this question.