Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The anomalous data identification procedures existing today in power system state estimation become problematic-if not totally unefficient-under stringent conditions, such as multiple and interacting bad data. The identification method presented in this paper attempts to alleviate these difficulties. It consists in :(i) computing measurement error estimates and using them as the random variables of concern;(ii) making decisions on the basis of a hypothesis testing which takes into account their statistical properties. Two identification techniques are then derived and further investigated and assessed by means of a realistic illustrative example. Conceptually novel, the identification methodology is thus shown to lead to practical procedures which are efficient, reliable and workable under all theoretically feasible conditions.
Cutsem et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: