Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Dementia diagnosis in sub-Saharan Africa is constrained by limited access to specialist neuroimaging interpretation and reduced specificity of brief cognitive tools in low-literacy populations. We evaluated the agreement, incremental value, and comparative performance of Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), visual MRI medial temporal atrophy (MTA), and automated brain morphometry in older Ugandan adults with suspected dementia. Methods: normative percentiles. Hippocampal occupancy (HOC <5th percentile) was used as a reference MRI biomarker for comparative classification. Agreement between visual and automated measures was assessed using Spearman correlation and intraclass correlation. Incremental value was assessed using regression models, and comparative performance using area under the curve (AUC). Results: = 0.028; p = 0.18). For comparative classification, MMSE alone was sensitive but poorly specific, while the combined MMSE-MTA model improved specificity and discrimination (AUC 0.70 vs 0.62 for either measure alone). Conclusion: Visual and automated MRI measures were not interchangeable in this heterogeneous cohort. Automated hippocampal volumetry added limited value beyond visual MTA for global cognition, while combining MMSE with visual MTA showed modest improvement in comparative classification and warrants further validation.
Nassanga et al. (Wed,) studied this question.