Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The aim of this paper is to analyse from various points of view the relationships between abduction and deduction. In particular, we consider a meta-level definition of abduction in terms of deduction, similar to various definitions proposed in the literature, and an object-level definition in which abductive conclusions are expressed as a logicalconsequence of the observations and of a simple transformation of the domain theory based on predicate completion. The equivalence between the two definitions is proved for domain theories of considerable expressive power. The object-level characterization we propose uses very simple forms of reasoning and the equivalence result allows us to make explicit some of the assumptions underlying meta-level definitions of abduction. The use of predicate completion in characterizing abductive explanations shows a relation between abduction and foundations of logic programming.
Console et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: