Abstract In many English language teaching classrooms, learners approach reading texts primarily as sources of answers rather than as opportunities to construct meaning. This comment piece describes this pattern as procedural reading: a form of engagement shaped by repeated exposure to comprehension tasks that reward efficient answer location. While such strategies are adaptive in assessment-oriented contexts, they may narrow learners’ conception of reading and limit opportunities for deeper comprehension. Drawing on classroom observations, I explores how common task formats can influence reading behaviour and reader orientation. I then outline practical ways for teachers to rebalance task design to support both exam performance and meaningful engagement with texts. The aim is not to reject efficiency, but to restore balance between answer-focused and meaning-focused reading.
Mfanukhona Wonderboy Kunene (Sat,) studied this question.