4124 Background: FGFR2 alterations occur in 10-20% of iCCA. While FGFR-directed therapies are established for FGFR2 fusions, the genomic landscape and therapeutic relevance of non-fusion FGFR2 alterations remain poorly defined. Methods: Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 9,661 iCCA cases negative for FGFR2 rearrangements/fusions to identify FGFR2 short-variant sequence mutations and amplifications (Non- FGFR2 SV/AMP). Biomarkers included tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), homologous recombination deficiency deficiency signature (HRDsig), and PD-L1 expression (TPS). Genomic features were compared with FGFR2 -wild-type ( FGFR2 wt) iCCA. Clinical outcomes were assessed in a single-center cohort treated with FGFR inhibitors. Results: Non- FGFR2 SV/AMP alterations were identified in 324 cases (3.4%), consisting of SV (92.8%), AMP (6.1%), or both (1.1%). Among short variants, 66.0% localized to the extracellular domain, 23.1% to the transmembrane domain, 7.69% to the kinase domain, and 3.21% to the cytoplasmic non-kinase domain. Compared with FGFR2 wt tumors, Non- FGFR2 SV/AMP iCCA occurred more frequently in females (57.7% vs 50.0%, p = 0.02) and showed similar age, genomic ancestry, trinucleotide signatures, MSI-high status (1.6% vs 1.8%), TMB > 10 mt/Mb (2.2% vs 3.6%), PD-L1 positivity (18.8% vs 21.4%), and HRDsig positivity (4.6% vs 5.0%). Co-occurring actionable alterations ( IDH1 , ERBB2, BRAF , MTAP loss) were less frequent in Non-FGFR2 SV/AMP tumors, while BAP1 , NF2 and TSC1 alterations were enriched. Among 42 patients with non-fusion FGFR2 alterations treated at a single center, 16 (38%) received FGFR-directed therapy including pemigatinib, futibatinib, tinengotinib, lirafrugatinib and derazantinib. The objective response rate was 25% (95% CI: 7.3-52.4). Best responses included partial response (25%), stable disease (50%), and progressive disease (25%), with a median duration of response of 5.4 (95% CI: 1.9-8.9) months. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients receiving FGFR-targeted therapy compared with those who did not (28.4 months 95% CI, 23.8-33.0 vs 14.6 months 95% CI, 6.25-23.0; p = 0.023). Recurrent FGFR2 mutations involved N549K (kinase), C382R (transmembrane), and Y375C (extracellular) domains. Conclusions: Non-fusion FGFR2 sequence mutations and amplifications define a distinct subset of iCCA with fewer alternative actionable drivers and sensitivity to FGFR-targeted therapy. These findings support consideration of FGFR inhibition beyond FGFR2 fusions and highlight the need for refined patient selection strategies.
David et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: