PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 20242 citationsOpen Access

How funny is ChatGPT? A comparison of human- and A.I.-produced jokes

DGDrew GorenzNSNorbert Schwarz

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Can a large language model produce humor? Past research has focused on finding examples of these models succeeding or failing at producing humor in the eyes of the authors, without surveying peoples’ actual judgments of its output. These examples, while interesting, do not shed light on exactly how funny ChatGPT is to the general public, nor do they analyze ChatGPT’s humor production abilities in comparison to humans’ abilities. To explore this question, we gave the same comedic prompts to ChatGPT 3.5 and laypeople, and asked them to generate humorous responses (Study 1). We also asked ChatGPT 3.5 to generate humorous satirical headlines and compared them to published examples from professional comedy writers at The Onion (Study 2). Other participants rated the funniness of the human and A.I.-produced responses in each study. ChatGPT 3.5-produced jokes were rated as equally funny or funnier than human-generated responses regardless of the comedic task and the expertise of the human comedy writer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gorenz et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c444d666b677c61a94397https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5yz8n
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Art expertise: a study of concepts and conceptual spaces2006 · 132 citations
  2. 2The pragmatic profile of ChatGPT: assessing the communicative skills of a conversational agent2023 · 14 citations
  3. 3Beauty in the Eye of Expert and Nonexpert Beholders: A Study in the Appraisal of Art1996 · 195 citations
  4. 4Benign Violations2010 · 640 citations
  5. 5Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion2019 · 1,413 citations