Background Type 2 diabetic kidney disease (T2DKD) affects 20–40% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and has become the leading cause of end-stage renal disease globally. Early identification of patients at risk of rapid progression remains challenging, as existing prediction models often rely on complex indicators unsuitable for primary care settings. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model using routine clinical parameters to predict T2DKD progression. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled 349 patients diagnosed with T2DKD according to clinical criteria at Quzhou People’s Hospital in China between June 2022 and June 2025. From 36 baseline characteristics, four core predictors were identified through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariable logistic regression. Six machine learning models were constructed, and model performance was evaluated by discrimination, calibration, and clinical net benefit. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. Results Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and age were identified as independent core predictors. The neural network (NN) model achieved optimal performance in the test dataset, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.742, satisfactory calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow P = 0.2020), the lowest Brier score (0.2105), and superior clinical net benefit across risk thresholds of 0.2–0.6. SHAP analysis confirmed stable feature importance rankings between training and test datasets (Pearson r = 0.976) and revealed synergistic interactions among MASLD, AST, and DPN. Conclusion A NN model incorporating four routine clinical indicators effectively predicts T2DKD progression risk. This cost-effective tool is suitable for clinical practice and community health services, offering a scalable solution for early intervention and prognosis improvement.
Xiong et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: