The play "Abhijnanshakuntalam" by Kalidasa is known for its sentiments and poetic ability. It revolves around the characters Shakuntala and Dushyanta following their first meeting, eventful separation, and fateful reunion. However, it also subtly asks bigger questions about authority and legitimacy. Shakuntala was raised in a hermitage, living a life of simplicity. Everything changes when she attends the royal court, where she must prove herself and gain validation. This paper approaches ‘Abhijnanashakuntalam’ through a feminist lens, examining how aesthetics have structured patriarchal notions, recognition as a tool for male validation, and the portrayal of liminal aspects of womanhood. Dushyanta and Shakuntala got into a Gandharva marriage; Even though it was consensual and mutual, Shakuntala faced direct consequences. It examines how the lost ring is represented as a token for love, recognition, and memory. Her testimony and pregnancy weren't validated until the recovery of material proof and return of his memory; this showcases the conditional agency the women had. She also embodies liminal womanhood, as she transcends from forest to court and later to the celestial realm; she is still defined by her father, husband, and son rather than her autonomous self. This paper emphasizes on how the play acknowledges female agency, yet through the constraints of a male-centric system.
Jain et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: