Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve functional and neurohormonal indices in patients with chronic heart failure (LVEF < 35%, QRS >150 ms, NYHA III-IV)?
CRT improves cardiac and neurohormonal indices over 6-12 months in severe heart failure, with baseline peak VO2 being the strongest predictor of response.
OBJECTIVES: To assess in patients with chronic heart failure the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) over 12 months' follow-up the time course of the changes in functional and neurohormonal indices and to identify responders to CRT. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients (74.1 +/- 1 years, left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF 150 ms, in stable New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV on optimal medical treatment were prospectively randomized either in a control (n = 45) or CRT (n = 44) group and underwent clinical evaluation, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), 2D-Echo, heart rate variability (HRV), carotid baroreflex (BRS), and BNP assessments before and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: In the CRT group, improvement of cardiac indices and BNP concentration were evident at medium term (over 6 months) follow-up, and these changes persisted on a longer term (12 months) (all P < 0.05). Instead CPET indices and NYHA class improved after 12 months associated with restoration of HRV and BRS (all P < 0.05). We identified 26 responders to CRT according to changes in LVEF and diameters. Responders presented less depressed hemodynamic (LVEF 25 +/- 1.0 vs 22 +/- 0.1%), functional (peak VO(2) 10.2 +/- 0.2 vs 6.9 +/- 0.3 ml/kg/min), and neurohormonal indices (HRV 203.6 +/- 15.7 vs 147.6 +/- 10.ms, BRS 4.9 +/- 0.2 vs 3.6 +/- 0.3 ms/mmHg) (all P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, peak VO(2) was the strongest predictor of responders. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in functional status is associated with restoration of neurohormonal reflex control at medium term. Less depressed functional status (peak VO(2)) was the strongest predictor of responders to CRT.
Piepoli et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: