This article develops an Evoluist response to a broader philosophical and psychological problem: how purposeful human action remains possible under conditions of non-finality. The starting point is not merely internal to Evoluism, but concerns a general limit of human orientation: no theory, worldview, ideology, scientific system, religious doctrine, or personal conviction can legitimately claim final possession of Reality. This raises a central psychological question: if no finite aim can possess the whole, how can human beings pursue serious goals without falling into paralysis, fragmentation, or nihilism? The article argues that goals are indispensable structures of attention, will, identity, prediction, and meaning. They become pathological, however, when they are finalised into idols. To address this danger, the article develops an Evoluist account of working paradigms, finite goals as stages, formative orientation, and formative participation. A goal understood as a stage is real and worthy of deep commitment, yet remains limited and corrigible. Formative orientation names the disciplined capacity to move through such goals without granting them final authority over life, meaning, or Reality. Evoluism does not weaken purpose; it disciplines its status. It aims to preserve strong, decisive action while refusing the idolisation of any finite aim. In this sense, the article presents Evoluism not as a Theory of Everything, but as a framework for orienting human purpose after the impossibility of final possession has been recognised.
M. Evoluit (Sun,) studied this question.