Does the non-invasive myocardial work index (NMWI) based on pressure-strain loops improve the diagnostic accuracy of distinguishing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy?
Non-invasive myocardial work index parameters, specifically global constructive work combined with conventional echocardiography, provide high diagnostic accuracy (94.7%) in distinguishing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.
Background The capacity to distinguish hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (H-LVH) based on morphological features obtained by conventional echocardiography is limited. We investigated the global myocardial work of the left ventricle in two types of hypertrophies using the non-invasive myocardial work index (NMWI). Methods Conventional echocardiography was performed on 107 subjects with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%), who comprised patients with HCM ( n = 40), H-LVH ( n = 35), and healthy people with normal blood pressure and left ventricular structure ( n = 32). Except for the conventional echocardiographic parameters, the left ventricular myocardial work parameters based on pressure-strain loops, including global myocardial work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE), were evaluated in three groups. Multivariate discriminant analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the incremental value of NMWI for distinguishing HCM from H-LVH. Results Compared to the control group, GWI and GCW were significantly lower in HCM patients ( P 0.05), whereas GWI was significantly higher in H-LVH patients. GWW was higher and GWE was significantly decreased in both HCM and H-LVH patients than in the control group ( P 0.05). Multivariate discriminant analysis and ROC curve revealed that the inter-ventricular septum thickness (IVST)/left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) and GCW were each able to distinguish HCM from H-LVH. The combination of IVST/LVPWT and GCW discriminated HCM and H-LVH with a higher predictive accuracy of 94.7%. Conclusion NMWI may provide additional information in evaluating the myocardial function in patients with HCM and H-LVH. Myocardial work combined with conventional echocardiography could improve the clinical diagnostic accuracy of distinguishing HCM and H-LVH.
Zhao et al. (Tue,) studied this question.