March 1, 1975

An Empirical Analysis of Nominal and Interacting Groups.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

No significant differences were found between nominal and interacting groups in number of items generated, number of unique responses, or quality of responses, thus contradicting previously publish...

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

Cite This Study

T. B. Green (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ebf566540130b7faf440b https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/255625

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes.1974 · 703 citations
2Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups.1961 · 654 citations
3NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUES FOR INVOLVING CLIENTS AND RESOURCE EXPERTS IN PROGRAM PLANNING.1970 · 21 citations
4Effects of "brainstorming" instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects.1959 · 322 citations
5The Contribution of a Discussion Leader to the Quality of Group Thinking: The Effective Use of Minority Opinions1952 · 171 citations

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark