Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: The R21 malaria vaccine is a next-generation, WHO-prequalified vaccine that was introduced to reduce the burden of clinical malaria. In alignment with WHO recommendations, multi-dose vaccine presentations are preferred for large-scale immunization and inclusion in the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI). Accurate protein quantification is a critical quality control parameter for lot release, but it remains challenging when the antigen is present at low protein concentrations or formulated with complex matrices, including adjuvants, stabilizers, and preservatives. Methods: In this study, multiple protein estimation methods including Micro-BCA, BCA, and Bradford assays were evaluated to determine their suitability for quantifying the R21 antigen formulated with Matrix-M1 adjuvant and 2-PE preservative. The Bradford assay was selected as the most appropriate method, based on a comparative assessment of precision, accuracy, and linearity. Further optimization was undertaken to identify suitable buffer systems, and the method was validated in accordance with ICH Q2(R2) guidelines. Results: Validation results demonstrated that the assay is specific, accurate, precise, and repeatable, with a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 2 µg/mL. The method demonstrated comparable performance to ELISA and was found to be sensitive enough to detect changes in antigen concentration resulting from unintended adsorption of R21 to vial surfaces. The assay offers a rapid, high-throughput, and cost-effective solution for protein quantitation in commercial manufacturing, lot release, and stability studies. The protein content of the drug product, quantified using the Bradford method, demonstrated robust in vivo immunogenicity in both release and stability studies. Conclusions: The robustness and reproducibility of the assay establish a new benchmark in quality control for virus-like particle (VLP)-based vaccines with complex formulations, thereby supporting the precision and reliability required for global malaria prevention efforts.
Jena et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: