Preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment of high-risk surgical patients resulted in 61.8% being directly approved for surgery, 22.5% requiring reassessment, and 15.7% deemed ineligible.
Cohort (n=249)
No
Does preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment of high-risk patients improve the safety and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery?
Preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment for high-risk surgical patients facilitates careful risk stratification and optimization, allowing the majority to undergo surgery with acceptable one-year survival.
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment for high-risk surgical patients. Preoperative MDT meetings can help to improve surgical care, but there is little evidence on whether they improve patient outcomes. METHODS: This paper aims to share our experience of MDT meetings for high-risk surgical patients to underline their added value to the current standard of care. An observational study of a retrospective cohort of preoperative high-risk MDT meetings of a tertiary referral hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. For 249 patients the outcomes preoperative data, MDT decisions, and patient outcomes were collected from electronic health records. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 249 patients were discussed at high-risk MDT meetings. Most of the patients (97%) were assessed as having an American Society of Anesthesiology score ≥ 3, and 219 (88%) had a European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Anaesthesiology risk score of intermediate or high. After MDT assessment, 154 (62%) were directly approved for surgery, and 39 (16%) were considered ineligible for surgery. The remaining 56 (23%) patients underwent additional assessments before reconsideration at a high-risk MDT meeting. The main reason for patients being discussed at the high-risk MDT meeting was to assess the risk-benefit ratio of surgery. Ultimately, 184 (74%) patients underwent surgery. Of the operated patients, 122 (66%) did not have a major complication in the postoperative period, and 149 patients (81%) were alive after one year. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort study shows the vulnerability and complexity of high-risk patients but also shows that the use of an MDT assessment contributes too improved peri- and postoperative treatment strategies in high-risk patients. Most patients underwent surgery after careful risk assessment and, if deemed necessary, preoperative and perioperative treatment optimization to reduce their risk.
Kuiper et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in High-risk surgical patients (n=249). Preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment was evaluated on Advice of the MDT meeting (approval for surgery, reassessment, or ineligibility for surgery). Preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment of high-risk surgical patients resulted in 61.8% being directly approved for surgery, 22.5% requiring reassessment, and 15.7% deemed ineligible.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: