Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: is known to approximate 15 in young well-trained adults. Presumably, the same value is inaccurate for middle-aged men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: were: 49.4±6.4 years, 26.3±3.2 kg/m², 48.5±10.1 metabolic equivalent hours per day, 33.7±7.6 mL/min/kg, 170.1±15.4 beats/min, and 63.3±10.8 beats/min. They included never-smokers 38%, former smokers 29%, and current smokers 33%. RESULTS: in around 50-year-old men approximated 12. One year in age, one step change in BMI (normal weight, overweight, obese), smoking status (never, former, current), and TPA (moderately active, active, highly active) reduced the proportionality factor by 0.1, 0.6, 0.4, and 0.1, respectively. The proportionality factor in obese or current smoking middle-aged men was one point lower compared to normal weight or never-smoking peers. This corresponds to approximately 10 years in chronological age. CONCLUSIONS: . BMI and smoking status can be considered in calculations to improve accuracy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ari Voutilainen
General / Preventive / Lipids
Mounir Ould Setti
University of Eastern Finland
Tomi‐Pekka Tuomainen
General / Preventive / Lipids
The World Journal of Men s Health
University of Eastern Finland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Voutilainen et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2025104f3426e554a1bcc8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.200055
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: