Percutaneous valve interventions, including aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair, are feasible in high-risk patients but require further evaluation against contemporary treatments.
This review highlights the evolution and growing role of percutaneous valve interventions, noting the established success of mitral commissurotomy and the emerging feasibility of percutaneous aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since its introduction 27 years ago by Andreas Gruntzig, interventional cardiology has expanded its scope from coronary disease to peripheral, congenital, and also valve diseases.Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy and aortic valvuloplasty have been performed since the mid 1980s. Balloon commissurotomy has been used in tens of thousands of patients worldwide and provides good short- and long-term results in a wide range of patients. It has virtually replaced surgical commissurotomy in the management of mitral stenosis. On the other hand, percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty is almost abandoned worldwide due to its lack of efficacy and the risks involved. RECENT FINDINGS: The new techniques of percutaneous valve intervention are aortic valve replacement, and mitral valve repair. Both are at an early stage since the first in-man applications only started in 2002. Preliminary series show that these techniques are feasible; however, they must be further evaluated in comparison with contemporary treatment to accurately assess efficacy and risks. Today potential applications concern high-risk patients, however, after thorough evaluation this may be extended to others in the future. SUMMARY: Therefore, percutaneous interventions already play an important role in management of valvular heart disease, which is likely to grow in the future.
Vahanian et al. (Fri,) conducted a review in Valvular heart disease. Percutaneous valve procedures was evaluated. Percutaneous valve interventions, including aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair, are feasible in high-risk patients but require further evaluation against contemporary treatments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: