Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
An RNA-seq experiment with 48 biological replicates in each of 2 conditions was performed to determine the number of biological replicates (nᵣ) required, and to identify the most effective statistical analysis tools for identifying differential gene expression (DGE). When nᵣ=3, seven of the nine tools evaluated give true positive rates (TPR) of only 20 to 40 percent. For high fold-change genes (|log₂ (FC) |2) the TPR is 85 percent. Two tools performed poorly; over- or under-predicting the number of differentially expressed genes. Increasing replication gives a large increase in TPR when considering all DE genes but only a small increase for high fold-change genes. Achieving a TPR 85% across all fold-changes requires nᵣ20. For future RNA-seq experiments these results suggest nᵣ6, rising to nᵣ12 when identifying DGE irrespective of fold-change is important. For 6 nᵣ 12, superior TPR makes edgeR the leading tool tested. For nᵣ 12, minimizing false positives is more important and DESeq outperforms the other tools.
Schurch et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: