What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to articulate the concept of 'there-is' within Kasei-Theory, focusing on its conditions for readability and maintainability.

June 7, 2026Open Access

Kasei-Theory I.There-Is: There-Is Without Presence

Key Points

The aim is to articulate the concept of 'there-is' within Kasei-Theory, focusing on its conditions for readability and maintainability.
Analyzes local maintainability under constrained conditions.
Examines structural positions and configurational differentiation.
Differentiates between 'there-is' and traditional notions of presence and existence.
'There-is' is defined as fixed only under local conditions, separate from universal existence.
Configuring differentiation is maintainable without reliance on objecthood or tactile access.
The paper concludes that no universal ontological structures are necessary or established.

Abstract

This paper presents there-is within the first system of Kasei-Theory as a non-modal readability maintainability architecture. The paper does not propose a theory of presence, existence, being, manifestation, ontological persistence, completed configurational actuality, tactile access, objecthood, residuality-derived ground, trace-derived preservation, appearance-derived manifestation, impossibility-derived negation, or transcendental presence. Instead, it fixes there-is, local there-is, configurational differentiation, local maintainability, local readability maintainability, tactile-access non-derivation, formal there-is, and non-totality as distributed structural positions within constrained local readability maintainability. There-is is not treated as presence, existence, being, actuality, objecthood, tactile access, or residual ground, but as constrained local there-is under which configurational differentiation remains locally maintainable without universal presence, completed ontology, objecthood, tactile access, residuality-derived ground, or total configurational closure. There-is does not establish presence. There-is does not establish existence. There-is does not establish being. There-is does not establish objecthood. There-is does not establish tactile access. There-is does not establish terminal configurational actuality. There-is remains fixed only as constrained local there-is within readability maintainability. This paper fixes only the local there-is conditions under which configurational differentiation remains maintainable without transition into universal actuality, completed ontological coherence, tactile access, objecthood, residuality-derived ground, trace-derived preservation, appearance-derived manifestation, impossibility-derived negation, or total configurational integration. No subject is presupposed. No ontological structure is established. No universal existence structure is secured. No total configurational closure is completed. This paper is part of Kasei-Theory.

Read Full Paperexternally

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper