PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 8, 2026Journal of Community Genetics0 citationsOpen Access

Public and patient involvement in developing a survey on re-consent for pediatric genomic data sharing in Japan: a GRIPP2-LF report

HTHiroko Terui-KohbataTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityMYMidori YamamotoChiba UniversityTTTomoyo TakeuchiUniversity of Tsukuba Hospital

Key Points

  • This work aims to gather public perspectives on re-consent for pediatric genomic data sharing in Japan through a survey.
  • Conducted four stages of public and patient involvement (PPI) to refine the survey and information sheet.
  • Involved five PPI members from diverse backgrounds, aged 20-60 years.
  • Documented all revisions using the GRIPP2-Long Form for transparency.
  • PPI members provided diverse feedback on re-consent and secondary data use, enhancing survey relevance.
  • Incorporated 83% of comments from the first round and 87% from the second round into revisions.
  • Major improvements included clearer terminology and explanations about parent-child consent.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Japan, adolescents who entered genomic research under proxy consent are asked to re-consent at age 16 for newly collected data, while previously collected data remain usable without consent. Public perspectives on re-consent and data sharing are not well understood. To prepare a survey for adolescents, we used public and patient involvement (PPI) to refine the questionnaire and information sheet. METHODS: Four stages of PPI were conducted: a kickoff meeting, two rounds of web-based feedback, and a final discussion. Five PPI members (aged 20-60 s, diverse backgrounds) provided iterative feedback on survey design, wording, and framing. All revisions were documented using GRIPP2-Long Form. RESULTS: PPI members expressed diverse views on re-consent and acceptable secondary data use, supporting the relevance of the survey design. Feedback resulted in major revisions, including clearer terminology, unified wording, improved explanations of parent-child context, existing versus newly collected data, age categorization, and Japan's opt-out procedures. Of 36 comments in the first round, 30 (83%) were incorporated; of 23 comments in the second round, 20 (87%) were incorporated. CONCLUSION: PPI enhanced the clarity, cultural relevance, and acceptability of materials for a survey on re-consent in pediatric genomic data sharing. As one of the first systematic PPI reports from Japan, this work demonstrates how systematic involvement strengthens ethically sensitive research and provides a transparent foundation for forthcoming surveys.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Terui-Kohbata et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a265c1dad53cfb9357c56b1https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-026-00907-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Re-Consent Practices in Biobanks in Japan: Current Status and Stakeholder Perspectives2025
  2. 2Secondary use of genomic data: patients’ decisions at point of testing and perspectives to inform international data sharing2024 · 14 citations
  3. 3Individuals’ preferences for future biological sample and genomic data sharing in the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project2026
  4. 4Policy and process for returning raw genomic data to parents and young adult participants in a pediatric cancer precision medicine trial.2024
  5. 5Preferences, experiences and needs of parents and adolescents regarding germline sequencing in pediatric oncology2026