Electrophysiological maneuvers including differential ventricular overdrive pacing and His refractory premature ventricular complexes aided in diagnosing cNV and cHV pathways in 7 cases.
Case Report (n=7)
Do novel electrophysiological maneuvers aid in the diagnosis of concealed nodo-ventricular and His-ventricular pathways in patients with tachyarrhythmias?
Novel electrophysiological maneuvers, including differential VOD and His refractory PVCs, can aid in the challenging diagnosis of concealed nodo-ventricular and His-ventricular pathways.
BACKGROUND: Confirming the presence and participation of concealed nodo-ventricular (cNV) or concealed His-ventricular (cHV) pathways in tachyarrhythmias is challenging. We describe novel observations to aid in diagnosing cNV or cHV pathways. METHODS: We present 7 cases of cNV and cHV pathway-mediated arrhythmias and focus on several laboratory observations: (1) differential ventricular overdrive pacing (VOD) from the base versus apex, (2) response to His refractory premature ventricular complexes, (3) paradoxical atriohisian response (shorter atriohisian interval during tachycardia than that during sinus rhythm) in long RP tachycardia, and (4) the role of adenosine to aid in the diagnosis. RESULTS: Three cases underwent differential VOD during tachycardia. All demonstrated a shorter postpacing interval minus tachycardia cycle length during basal pacing than apical pacing with one case exhibiting apical VOD results compatible with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Basal VOD was useful for localizing the ventricular connection in a case with cHV pathway. In 3 cases, His refractory premature ventricular complexes reset the tachycardia without conduction to the atrium, which excluded the involvement of an atrioventricular pathway or atrial tachycardia, or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia alone. One case had His refractory premature ventricular complexes followed by subsequent constant AA interval and then tachycardia termination, suggesting a bystander cNV pathway involvement. Two cNV pathway cases presented with long RP tachycardia had paradoxical atriohisian shortening of >15 ms, suggesting parallel activation of the atrium and the atrioventricular node. Adenosine terminated the tachycardia with retrograde block in 2 cases with cNV pathways but had no response on a cHV pathway. CONCLUSIONS: cNV and cHV pathways mediated tachyarrhythmias can present with variable clinical presentations. We emphasize the important role of differential VOD sites, His refractory premature ventricular complexes that reset or terminate the tachycardia without conduction to the atrium, paradoxical atriohisian response in long RP tachycardia, and the use of adenosine for diagnosing cNV and cHV pathways.
Higuchi et al. (Fri,) conducted a case report in Concealed nodo-ventricular (cNV) or concealed His-ventricular (cHV) pathway-mediated arrhythmias (n=7). Electrophysiological diagnostic maneuvers was evaluated. Electrophysiological maneuvers including differential ventricular overdrive pacing and His refractory premature ventricular complexes aided in diagnosing cNV and cHV pathways in 7 cases.