What question did this study set out to answer?

This analysis addresses the structural gap in British AI policy regarding the absence of a robust engineering layer.

June 15, 2026Open Access

British AI needs an audit substrate, not another white paper. The Bletchley Declaration, the Seoul Summit, AISI, ARIA, and the engineering layer none of them ship.

Key Points

This analysis addresses the structural gap in British AI policy regarding the absence of a robust engineering layer.
Examined various UK AI initiatives and their reliance on unspecified substrates.
Highlighted 101 filed patent applications relevant to Mickai.
Discussed the features and implications of the Mickai Sovereign Intelligence Operating System.
Mickai acts as the necessary substrate for British AI, lacking in existing policy.
The project involves significant intellectual property, with 1,982 claims filed under UK patents.
The Open Audit Record ensures AI actions are verifiable and secure.

Abstract

British AI policy in 2026 has the same structural problem as the rest of the world: there is no engineering layer underneath it. The Bletchley Declaration, the Seoul Summit communique, the UK AI Safety Institute's evaluation work, and ARIA's mission all assume the existence of a substrate they do not specify. Mickai is that substrate. One hundred and one filed UK patent applications, one thousand nine hundred and eighty-two claims, named inventor Mickarle Wagstaff-Irons, filed in Newport, built in the United Kingdom.Originally published at https://mickai.co.uk/articles/british-ai-needs-an-audit-substrate-not-another-white-paper. Mickai is a Sovereign Intelligence Operating System; the Open Audit Record signs every artificial intelligence action before it executes, post-quantum and offline-verifiable. 101 filed UK patent applications, Mickai LTD (Companies House 17166618).

Read Full Paperexternally

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper