Deep learning has significantly advanced image super-resolution (SR), yet many state-of-the-art models remain too computationally expensive for resource-constrained devices. This paper demonstrates that a highly parameter-efficient design can achieve comparable performance to the very deep super-resolution network (VDSR) with a tiny fraction of parameters. Starting from the classic VDSR architecture (2016), we systematically evaluate three design choices: depthwise separable convolution (DSConv), Hybrid Attention Transformer (HAT), and a local residual connection (LR). HAT provides no performance gain—an honest negative result supported by controlled experiments (increased training, different reduction ratios, and standard convolution baseline). In contrast, LR alone yields a 0.20 dB improvement without introducing any extra parameters. Consequently, we discard HAT and propose DSConv+LR. Our model contains only 49,217 parameters—about 7.4% of VDSR—yet attains a peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of 35.21 dB on Set5 (×2), which is 99.7% of VDSR’s performance (35.33 dB). On additional benchmarks (Set14, BSD100, and Urban100), DSConv+LR maintains similar relative performance (within 0.12 dB of VDSR). Perceptual loss (AlexNet features, lower better) is 0.2556, slightly better than VDSR (0.2717). We acknowledge that modern lightweight networks such as cascaded residual attention network (CARN) and information multi-distillation network (IMDN) achieve 2–3 dB higher PSNR at the cost of 9–14× more parameters. This work advocates a minimalist approach while honestly reporting both its strengths and limitations.
Hu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: