Type II diabetic db/db mice exhibit left ventricular contractile dysfunction from age 24 weeks onwards, but maintain cardiac output due to increased preload and decreased afterload.
BACKGROUND: Cardiomyopathy in type II diabetes is incompletely understood. The leptin receptor-deficient (db/db) mouse is a well-accepted model of type II diabetes. To date, left ventricular contractility has not been studied in animal models of type II diabetes with in vivo load-independent parameters. AIM: To determine cardiac function in db/db mice in vivo. METHODS: Cardiac function in 12- and 24-week-old db/db and wild-type mice was assessed using a microtip-pressure-conductance catheter. RESULTS: Left ventricular contractile dysfunction, measured by load-independent parameters (preload recruitable stroke work, end-systolic elastance, dP/dt-V(ed)), is present in diabetic mice from age 24 weeks onwards. Despite this contractile dysfunction, the conventional parameters cardiac output, ejection fraction and dP/dt(max) were maintained, which was due to an increased preload and decreased afterload. Ventriculo-arterial coupling was increased and mechanical efficiency significantly reduced in db/db mice. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that, despite impaired cardiac contractility and mechanical efficiency, cardiac output is maintained in db/db mice by favourable loading conditions and that in vivo load-independent measurements are necessary to fully characterize cardiac performance in animal models of pathophysiological states.
Bergh et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Type II diabetes (cardiomyopathy). Leptin receptor-deficient (db/db) genotype vs. Wild-type mice was evaluated on Cardiac function (load-independent parameters: preload recruitable stroke work, end-systolic elastance, dP/dt-V(ed)). Type II diabetic db/db mice exhibit left ventricular contractile dysfunction from age 24 weeks onwards, but maintain cardiac output due to increased preload and decreased afterload.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: