Ammonia is an essential high-volume chemical for fertilizer production and other industrial applications, and it is increasingly considered a potential energy carrier; however, its conventional manufacture remains highly energy- and carbon-intensive because it relies predominantly on fossil-based Haber–Bosch (HB) synthesis. This review compares sustainable ammonia-production pathways through the linked dimensions of technology readiness, environmental performance, and economic plausibility across renewable-H2 HB, biomass- and waste-derived HB routes, electrochemical pathways, photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical systems, plasma-assisted synthesis, biological routes, and chemical looping ammonia synthesis. The analysis reveals a clear divide between pathways that benefit from established industrial infrastructure and those that still depend on unresolved catalytic, materials, or systems-level advances. Renewable-H2 Haber–Bosch emerges as the most broadly scalable near-term option for large-scale ammonia decarbonization because it combines the highest maturity among low-carbon routes with the strongest techno-economic and life-cycle evidence base. Biomass- and waste-derived Haber–Bosch pathways may become cost-competitive regional complements when low-cost local residues, organic waste, or biomethane is available, feedstock logistics are favorable, and carbon, waste-treatment, or negative-emission credits are included. Overall, sustainable ammonia production is likely to advance through a portfolio of pathways, with near-term progress led by renewable-H2 HB and longer-term development dependent on improved reactor integration, harmonized assessment methods, and scalable validation.
Amirhaeri et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: