We performed a cross-layer, system-level analysis of the post-quantum transition of blockchain architectures through a systematic review. The analysis, based on 108 peer-reviewed studies, moves beyond post-quantum cryptography (PQC) as merely a primitive substitution and examines how quantum pressures cascade through validation, propagation, interoperability, governance, and regulatory layers. Empirical results show that the authenticated payloads for lattice signatures grow from ~65–73 bytes (ECDSA) up to kilobyte-scale sizes, and verification overhead is increased by a factor of 2× to 5× depending on the deployment scenario. Such inflation can narrow block-capacity margins, increase propagation delay under fixed-interval regimes, and shift validator resource thresholds in heterogeneous networks. Moreover, the harvest-now–decrypt-later model creates a temporal asymmetry between the design options and the exposure window. These findings indicate that post-quantum resilience depends more on maintaining a structural balance among the tightly coupled technical and institutional stress channels than on the strength of the algorithm itself, and migration success ultimately depends on the ability to coordinate the management of these constraints, rather than on managing them separately.
Ishchukova et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: