Abstract This paper offers a new line of argument for challenging the still somewhat prevailing view of logic as a politically neutral discipline by connecting the psychological concept of ambiguity (in-)tolerance with the treatment of contradictions in formal logic(s). While contradictions are rigidly rejected in classical logic, paraconsistent and contradictory logics are more accommodating towards them. In this context, the well-studied concept of ambiguity (in-)tolerance seems relevant, suggesting a connection between the outright dismissal of contradictions and rigid cognitive dispositions that may conflict with democratic values. On this basis, the paper offers a socio-political – rather than purely technical or theoretical – argument for taking contradiction-tolerant logics seriously, promoting their study and not excluding them from curricula. Thus, it contributes to the literature of exploring how our formal choices in logic may carry societal implications.
Sara Ayhan (Thu,) studied this question.