Abstract In this essay, I argue that for women, rather than a flaw to be suppressed, embracing anger is a vital act of self-care and resilience. While philosophical traditions often dismiss women’s anger as irrational, I argue that it is a legitimate response to injustice and a necessary tool for reclaiming agency. I begin by examining how traditions from the Stoics to Aristotle have framed anger as an impediment to reason. This framing is often used to position women’s anger as evidence of a weak or shameful state. I then argue that these social constraints are not universal; specifically, Black women must navigate the angry Black woman stereotype, which treats their expressions of anger as threatening or excessive. Drawing on my own history and the cultural evolution of “the angry woman” in the media, I next highlight that women become experts at controlling anger because the alternative is being labeled emotional or facing physical danger. I conclude by arguing that caring for oneself does not mean overcoming anger but rather embracing it as a source of strength. Seen as such, anger, then, becomes a form of self-respect and a liberating act of reclaiming.
Parish Conkling (Fri,) studied this question.