Abstract This research combined critical discourse analysis (CDA), concordance analysis and thematic analysis to understand early adolescent students’ conceptions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). The rapid rise of GenAI has raised new questions for learning in all levels of education, given the capacity of ChatGPT and other GenAI applications (Gemini, Dall-E, MS Co-Pilot) to instantly produce text and images. The study analysed how GenAI was discursively conceptualised by early adolescents (Grades 7–8, ages 11–13 years) who were familiar with ChatGPT, while participating in qualitative focus groups in a secondary school. The focus group data was iteratively coded using thematic and concordance analysis identifying four repeated themes in the students’ discourse: (i) GenAI is easy to use, downplaying the revolutionary progress, (ii) GenAI and power: machine versus human responsibility, (iii) GenAI and epistemology: what machines and humans know, and (iv) GenAI and ontology: what is actual or real. CDA was also used to interpret students’ discursive construction of GenAI. The study provides insights into adolescent perspectives of the complexities of GenAI in their own terms. The findings are significant given the paucity of research that applies discursive analyses or concordance analysis to student conceptions of GenAI, and the increasing and inevitable influence of GenAI in everyday life.
Morrison et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: