What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to investigate the ontological roles of bosons and fermions within the context of gravity, proposing a new interpretation of particle relations and disclosures.

July 10, 2026Open Access

Bosonic Disclosure and Fermionic Residence Relation - Threshold, Closure, and the Non-Existence of the Graviton

Key Points

The aim is to investigate the ontological roles of bosons and fermions within the context of gravity, proposing a new interpretation of particle relations and disclosures.
Develops a closure-ontological framework for bosons and fermions.
Interprets interactions through phases of disclosure and residency rather than conventional classifications.
Extends previous SU(2) models to propose a broader particle ontology involving multiple particle types.
Bosons are defined by their capacity for disclosure across various interactions like phase propagation and charge transactions.
Fermions are characterized as individuation states, forming structures that foster bosonic disclosures.
Gravity is framed as a closure-curvature condition, rejecting the graviton as a fundamental particle.

Abstract

Gravity conditions. Bosons disclose. Fermions reside. Matter re-closes. This paper develops a closure-ontological interpretation of bosons, fermions, Higgs-like resonance thresholds, and gravity. Standard particle physics classifies particles operationally according to spin, charge, mass, gauge role, and interaction behavior. The present framework does not reject that operational classification, but asks a deeper ontological question: what mode of physical disclosure does each particle-type express? The central thesis is that particlehood is not a flat category. Bosons and fermions are not merely two species of object within a single particle inventory. Rather, they disclose different closure modes. Bosons disclose relation: phase propagation, charged transaction, neutral weak-depth contact, confinement binding, and mass-threshold differentiation. Fermions reside as identity: they are individuated closure states, carrying exclusion-structured identity and forming the residues into which bosonic disclosures may re-close. This framework extends the preceding SU(2) construction, in which weak interaction was interpreted as torsional transaction and W/Z bosons were understood as transaction carriers within the infratier sequence between U(1) phase communication and SU(3) confinement closure. The present paper generalizes that insight into a broader particle ontology: photons are phase-disclosure quanta, W bosons are charged transaction disclosures, Z bosons are neutral weak-depth disclosures, gluons are confinement-closure disclosures, and Higgs-like bosons are threshold-differentiation disclosures. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20102564 Gravity is treated differently. The framework rejects the graviton not by denying gravitational phenomena, but by refusing to reduce gravity to one more bosonic exchange particle. Gravity is interpreted as closure-curvature condition: the structural admissibility field under which relation, identity, and residence become physically possible. The graviton therefore represents a category error: it mistakes the condition of disclosure for an object disclosed within that condition.

Read Full Paperexternally

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper