PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Pathways to Peace and Security0 citationsOpen Access

Evolution of military–political approaches of Syria’s Transitional government

View Full Paper
AMAnton Mardasov

Key Points

  • HTS's governance prevented state paralysis while avoiding strict Shariah implementation.
  • The article details HTS's evolution from Al-Qaeda affiliations to more moderate Islamism.
  • Insights into Syrianization policies reveal shifts in governance approaches since HTS's rise.
  • Despite claims of liberalization, emerging leadership exhibits hypercentralization due to coup fears.

Abstract

Following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in December 2024, the extremist group “Hayat Tahrir al-Sham” (HTS) and associated quasi-state structures came to power in Syria. Prior to seizing power, HTS had gained certain experience of territorial governance in the Idlib province that it had partly controlled (and in the respective “Idlib de-escalation zone” that had been established by an agreement between Russia and Turkey). Once in power, the quasi-state bodies promptly extrapolated this experience to much of Syria’s territory, preventing the full paralysis of the state system and at the same time refraining from strictly implementing Shariah norms in the legal field. The article considers the main reasons for the departure of the group, originally affiliated with Al-Qaeda, from the ideology of Salafi jihadism and its shift to traditions of more moderate Islamism. The author examines the experience of HTS’ localization and the evolution of the faction’s approaches to governance through the prism of the “Syrianization” personnel policy, public military and political reforms, and media activity. He shows how the new Syrian authorities – first, the interim government and, then, the transitional government – have flexibly implemented the lessons learnt on a national scale. However, the author concludes that, despite public statements about the liberalization of the sociopolitical order, the new leadership tends to hypercentralize power, out of the fear of a possible new coup d’tat, as it maneuvers between moderate and radical groups within the system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anton Mardasov (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c189e09b7b07f3a0613945https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2025-1-187-207
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Geopolitical consequences of Bashar al-Assad's fall in Syria2026
  2. 2Gender Justice Lessons from North-East Syria Amidst Patriarchal Perpetuation in the New Syrian Arab Republic?2026
  3. 3The Relationship between the Religious Institution and the Political Regime in Syria after the Arab Spring 20112024
  4. 4Anatomy of the Fall of the Ba’ th Regime in Syria2026
  5. 5The internal-external nexus in moderation processes: how international constraints drove HTS from radicalism to statecraft in Syria.2026