PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2024European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing0 citations

Social networks - help or hindrance in patient care

View Full Paper
SPSorin PopFGF D GuzAGAlina M. Grigore

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background/Introduction After the pandemic, there has been a significant rise in the time people dedicate to social networks. Throughout periods of local and international lockdowns, these platforms became recognized as quicker and more effective tools for communication across various fields. Purpose We aimed to conduct a study to assess the effectiveness of deploying an information system to improve the communication process between patients and healthcare specialists. Methods A questionnaire consisting of 20 questions was utilized, completed by 43 patients or their relatives admitted between January 1, 2024, and January 31, 2024 in a cardiology ward of a tertiary centre. Results Among all participants, a proportion of 65% was represented by middle-aged women from urban areas, with 68.4% holding higher education degrees and 31.6% with secondary education. A vast majority (98%) reported using at least one social network daily for both professional and personal reasons. Eighty-three percent believe that doctor-patient interactions on social networks are ethical and regard it as a secure and effective method for communicating with healthcare professionals. Feedback from social networks did not significantly influence the selection of doctors or medical institutions. However, social network advertising notably affects the choice of medical specialists or institutions, with 48% of respondents indicating they sought out the most prominently featured hospitals or doctors on these platforms. Despite this, 72% of respondents were unaware of personalized advertising strategies or that such messages are often crafted by public relations firms. Most found social network communication with medical staff suitable for follow-ups (92%) but not for initial assessments or determining diagnostic procedures (81%). Still, there was reluctance to rely exclusively on social networks for choosing medical services. Conclusions Patients and their families are open to receiving medical information and communicating with healthcare providers through social networks. However, a limited understanding of the technologies employed to boost the visibility of specific content or endorse procedures on social media could expose patients to skewed information. Responsible regulation of medical information and advertising is imperiously needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pop et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e62382b6db6435875b5a9bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvae098.134
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating the satisfaction and utility of social networks in medical practice and continuing medical education2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Scope and Prospects of Social Media for Patient Education and Engagement in Medical Practice2026
  3. 3Enhancing Patient Outcomes through Social Media: Leveraging Information Sources for Improved Healthcare Results2024
  4. 4We Don’t Talk About X(Twitter): A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Social Media Utilization Among Neurologists2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Health Awareness: A Comprehensive Survey Analysis in the Middle East (Preprint)2024