Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The article reviews approaches towards regulation of a fact to be proven (thema probandum) in the Russian Federation and foreign jurisdictions, analyzes views of pre-revolutionary and soviet lawyers of this legal category. The author justifies the opinion that the highly structured nature and formality of a fact to be proven in Russia (Art. 73 the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation) is rather a disadvantage. In practice, it results in difficulties in the establishment of a thema probandum in a specific case where the crime is complicated and non-trivial. The author argues that general regulation of a thema probandum through the principle of relevance upon preservation of the list of issues resolved by court in a final judgment will make the process of investigation of highly profitable crimes more efficient and raise guarantees of the right to defense.
Ekaterina E. Shataylyuk (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: