Mediation as a conflict resolution tool in criminal proceedings in the context of martial law

The research relevance is determined by the need to develop alternative dispute resolution methods to improve the mechanism of protection of citizens’ rights in the context of a full-scale invasion. Therefore, the study aims to analyse the institution of mediation in criminal proceedings with due regard to the peculiarities of martial law. A range of methods were used for this purpose, namely, formal legal analysis logical analysis, legal hermeneutics, dogmatic method, logic and functional analyses. The study revealed that mediation is used in criminal proceedings only to reconcile the victim with the suspect. This procedure can solve the problem of overloading the courts and potentially delaying the resolution of disputes. As noted, under current legislation, a reconciliation agreement in criminal proceedings for domestic violence can only be concluded at the initiative of the victim; it was determined that it is necessary to provide that the relevant initiative for mediation in cases of such offences should also come from the victim. As suggested, legislative provisions should include mandatory participation of the victim’s representative in criminal proceedings in case the court decides to release the victim from serving a sentence with probation, substitute the remaining part of the sentence with a lesser one, or grant early release from serving a sentence. The ways to improve human rights guarantees in the mediation procedure under martial law were considered. The practical significance of the results obtained is to provide recommendations for improving the modern mechanism of this institution in criminal proceedings