PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 1083: Kras activity-linked glycolysis and immunosuppression in metastatic pancreatic cancer

View Full Paper
SMShuichi MitsunagaMMMari MasudaKKKoji Kato

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the relationship between KRAS activity and its impact on glycolysis and immune suppression in metastatic pancreatic cancer.
  • Evaluated mRNA and protein expression in needle-biopsied liver metastases from pancreatic cancer patients.
  • Calculated KRAS signature scores based on gene expression data.
  • Used weighted co-expression network analysis to identify KRAS-related gene modules.
  • Performed hierarchical clustering to classify KRAS-related subtypes.
  • High KRAS signature scores were linked to worse overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.895).
  • 90.9% of KRAS mutated samples showed high KRAS signature scores (P=0.004).
  • DUSP4 mRNA and several glycolytic proteins were up-regulated in high KRAS signature scores.
  • Down-regulation of immune profile genes, such as CD4 and CD8, was observed in high KRAS activity tumors.

Abstract

Abstract Background: KRAS mutations act as a driver of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), involving ERK-dependent gene transcription. Inhibition of mutated KRAS activity suppresses glycolysis and reshapes the poor immune profile in murine PDAC. Identification of these relationships in human PDAC is useful for realizing pivotal drivers of metabolic and immune dependency. Recently identified PDAC siKRAS KRASi iKras gene sets enable the creation of a precise KRAS signature score for KRAS activity. Using liver metastasis (LM)-derived transcriptome data, we evaluated the effect of KRAS signature score on clinical outcomes and the molecular features of metastatic PDAC. Methods: Comprehensive mRNA expression on cDNA microarray and 435 protein expressions on reverse-phased protein array (RPPA) were measured using needle-biopsied samples from treatment-naïve LM of PDAC. KRAS signature score was calculated in each sample. A KRAS-related gene module was determined based on the relationship between KRAS signature score and module eigengene from weighted co-expression network analysis. Hierarchical clustering of RPPA data generated KRAS-related subtypes, in which a KRAS-related protein was selected from the molecule encoded by the genes of KRAS-related gene modules. Results: KRAS signature score in LMs was calculated in 77 patients (Male: 65%; median age: 66 years). Patients with high KRAS signature score tumors (n=38) showed poor overall survival as compared to those with low KRAS signature score tumors (n=39; hazard ratio: 1.895 95% confidential interval: 1.123 to 3.198). KRAS mutated LMs (90.9%) were related to high KRAS signature scores (P=0.004). DUSP4 mRNA expression, an ERK-dependent negative feedback gene for ERK dephosphorylation, increased in tumors with high KRAS signature scores (P=0.017) and with KRAS mutation (P0.001). Thirty-seven proteins were identified as KRAS-related UP proteins, including those involved in the glycolysis pathway and a lactate transporter, MCT4. The gene up-regulation of glycolysis and lactate-efflux pathway was found in HK2 (P=0.132), Eno1, 2 (P0.001, P=0.016), PKM (P0.001), LDHA (P0.001), and MCT4 (P0.001). ZAP-70, a cytosolic tyrosine kinase essential for T cell receptor signaling, was present in nine KRAS-related DOWN proteins. The gene down-regulation of the immune profile was found in CD4 (P0.001), CD8A (P0.001), CD8B (P=0.013), and ZAP-70 (P0.001). Conclusion: KRAS up-regulated tumors showed elevation of glycolytic molecules and immunosuppression in LM of pancreatic cancer. KRAS activity might drive metabolic and immunological aggravation, leading to a poor prognosis. Citation Format: Shuichi Mitsunaga, Mari Masuda, Kota Kato, Hidetaka Suzuki, Mitsuhito Sasaki, Hiroki Yoshimatsu, Yoichi Kamei, Masafumi Ikeda. Kras activity-linked glycolysis and immunosuppression in metastatic pancreatic cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1083.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mitsunaga et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fceba79560c99a0a2a0ehttps://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-1083
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract A091: KRAS Mutation-Specific Immune Microenvironments in Pancreatic Cancer2025
  2. 2Abstract A034: KRAS Mutation-Specific effects on the Tumor Immune Microenvironment Drive Tumor Progression2024
  3. 3Abstract 6065: Decoding KRAS signaling intensity: A key driver of tumor aggressiveness and response to RAS inhibition in pancreatic cancer2026
  4. 4KRAS mutational landscape and immune microenvironment features in pancreatic cancer: Implications for targeted and combination therapeutic strategies.2026
  5. 5Abstract B020: Oncogenic KRAS drives nutrient transport to support growth in pancreatic cancer2025