Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The hydrogen-bond acceptor ability of sulfur in C=S systems has been investigated using crystallographic data retrieved from the Cambridge Structural Database and via ab initio molecular orbital calculations. The R 1 R 2 C=S bond lengths span a wide range, from 1. 58 Å in pure thiones (R 1 = R 2 = C sp 3) to 1. 75 Å in thioureido species (R 1 = R 2 = N) and in dithioates —CS^-₂. The frequency of hydrogen-bond formation at =S increases from 4. 8% for C=S > 1. 63 Å to more than 70% for C=S > 1. 70 Å in uncharged species. The effective electronegativity of S is increased by conjugative interactions between C=S and the lone pairs of one or more N substituents (R 1 R 2): a clear example of resonance-induced hydrogen bonding. More than 80% of S in —CS^-₂ accept hydrogen bonds. C=S. . . H—N, O bonds are shown to be significantly weaker than their C=O. . . H—N, O analogues by (a) comparing mean S. . . H and O. . . H distances (taking account of the differing non-bonded sizes of S and O and using neutron-normalized H positions) and (b) comparing frequencies of hydrogen-bond formation in `competitive' environments, i. e. in structures containing both C=S and C=O acceptors. The directional properties and hydrogen-bond coordination numbers of C=S and C=O acceptors have also been compared. There is evidence for lone-pair directionality in both systems, but =S is more likely (17% of cases) than =O (4%) to accept more than two hydrogen bonds. Ab initio calculations of residual atomic charges and electrostatic potentials reinforce the crystallographic observations.
Allen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: